Hi Paul,
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2021, 10:24:17 CET schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Dear Markus,
> Thank you for your patch.
I have to thank you.
> Am 12.11.21 um 15:28 schrieb markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> > From: Markus Hochholdinger <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > The superblock of version 1.0 doesn't get moved to the new position on a
> > device size change. This leads to a rdev without a superblock on a known
> > position, the raid can't be re-assembled.
> > Fixes: commit d9c0fa509eaf ("md: fix max sectors calculation for super
> > 1.0")
> I think it’s common to not write *commit* in there, but just the short
> hash. `scripts/checkpatch.pl` does not mention that, but it mentions:
> ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
> total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 7 lines checked
I'm sorry, this was my first patch request against the linux kernel.
Within https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/
tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst I read to sign off a patch if
it is from me, but the line was there before. So I thought I don't have to
sign it.
Should I do the patch request again with Signed-off information?
> > drivers/md/md.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> > index 6c0c3d0d905a..ad968cfc883d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> > @@ -2193,6 +2193,7 @@ super_1_rdev_size_change(struct md_rdev *rdev,
> > sector_t num_sectors)>
> > if (!num_sectors || num_sectors > max_sectors)
> > num_sectors = max_sectors;
> > + rdev->sb_start = sb_start;
> > }
> > sb = page_address(rdev->sb_page);
> > sb->data_size = cpu_to_le64(num_sectors);
> Kind regards,
> Paul
Regards,
Markus
