Re: Hard Drive Partition Table shows partition larger than drive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/27/20 1:54 PM, Phil Turmel wrote:
here is the output of lsdrv for the drive.

USB [usb-storage] Bus 001 Device 002: ID 152d:2338 JMicron Technology Corp. / JMicron USA Technology Corp. JM20337 Hi-Speed USB to SATA & PATA Combo Bridge {000000000005}
└scsi 4:0:0:0 TOSHIBA  HDWD110          {585T7P6NS}
  └sdb 931.51g [8:16] Partitioned (dos)
                                    ^^^^^
There's your answer.  This drive is using a dos partition table, not GPT.  But there's some info where the GPT would be that is confusing parted.

   └sdb1 931.51g [8:17] Empty/Unknown

As you can see, this partition entry is rational.

Try displaying the partition table with fdisk instead of parted.

Here is what fdisk says:

Disk /dev/sdb: 931.5 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 244190646 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 4096 = 4096 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x19e6cd02

Device     Boot Start        End    Sectors  Size Id Type
/dev/sdb1  *     2048 1953523711 1953521664  7.3T fd Linux raid autodetect

Note the discrepancy between the disk size and the partition size.

It seems the end sector for partition /dev/sdb1 is incorrect and should be 244190646 or 244190645 depending on how sectors are numberd that is if there is a sector 0 or it starts at 1.

--

Rob




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux