Re: Does a "check" of a RAID6 actually read all disks in a stripe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 28/4/20 9:47 pm, Phil Turmel wrote:
On 4/28/20 7:02 AM, Brad Campbell wrote:


On 28/4/20 2:47 pm, Brad Campbell wrote:
G'day all,

I have a test server with some old disks I use for beating up on. Bear in mind the disks are old and dicey which is *why* they live in a test server. I'm not after reliability, I'm more interested in finding corner cases.

One disk has a persistent read error (pending sector). This can be identified easily with dd on a specific or whole disk basis.

[trim /]

Examine on the suspect disk :

test:/home/brad# mdadm --examine /dev/sdj
/dev/sdj:
           Magic : a92b4efc
         Version : 1.2
     Feature Map : 0x1
      Array UUID : dbbca7b5:327751b1:895f8f11:443f6ecb
            Name : test:3  (local to host test)
   Creation Time : Wed Nov 29 10:46:21 2017
      Raid Level : raid6
    Raid Devices : 9

  Avail Dev Size : 3906767024 (1862.89 GiB 2000.26 GB)
      Array Size : 13673684416 (13040.24 GiB 14001.85 GB)
   Used Dev Size : 3906766976 (1862.89 GiB 2000.26 GB)
     Data Offset : 262144 sectors
    Super Offset : 8 sectors
    Unused Space : before=262056 sectors, after=48 sectors
           State : clean
     Device UUID : f1a39d9b:fe217c62:26b065e3:0f859afd

Internal Bitmap : 8 sectors from superblock
     Update Time : Tue Apr 28 09:39:23 2020
   Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset 72 sectors

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

        Checksum : cb44256b - correct
          Events : 177156

          Layout : left-symmetric
      Chunk Size : 64K

    Device Role : Active device 5
    Array State : AA.AAAAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing, 'R' == replacing)

The bad block log misfeature is turned on.  Any blocks recorded in it will never be read again by MD, last I looked.  This might explain what you are seeing.


While I see where you are going, the fact it corrected the bad sector by re-writing it during the re-build would intimate that isn't/wasn't the case.

Regards,

Brad




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux