On 2018-07-03 22:01:36 [+0200], To linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock handles irqsave/restore when
> taking/releasing the spin lock. With this variant the call of
> local_irq_save is no longer required.
Shaohua, are you with this?
> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 2031506a0ecd..e933bff9459e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -409,16 +409,15 @@ void raid5_release_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
> md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
> return;
> slow_path:
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> /* we are ok here if STRIPE_ON_RELEASE_LIST is set or not */
> - if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&sh->count, &conf->device_lock)) {
> + if (atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(&sh->count, &conf->device_lock, flags)) {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list);
> hash = sh->hash_lock_index;
> do_release_stripe(conf, sh, &list);
> spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
> release_inactive_stripe_list(conf, &list, hash);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> static inline void remove_hash(struct stripe_head *sh)
> --
> 2.18.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
