Re: force remapping a pending sector in sw raid5 array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 11 of February 2018 12:13:45 Phil Turmel wrote:
> On 02/10/2018 04:43 PM, Mateusz Korniak wrote:
>
> > data is saved under different location when such write fails for
> > later reads?
> 
> No. (...)

So having arrays having non-empty BBL members means that array is in fact 
degraded (for tiny part, but still), right?

Is there any option for mdadm --monitor to send warning e-mail when bbl entry 
is added? (I can't see anything regarding bbl in mdadm --monitor section) ?

-- 
Mateusz Korniak
"(...) mam brata - poważny, domator, liczykrupa, hipokryta, pobożniś,
 	krótko mówiąc - podpora społeczeństwa."
				Nikos Kazantzakis - "Grek Zorba"

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux