Re: force remapping a pending sector in sw raid5 array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 09 of February 2018 15:13:26 Phil Turmel wrote:
> If you have bad block lists enabled in your array, MD will *never* try
> to fix the underlying sectors

As far I was able to find, failed write marks sector in BBL. 
Does data is saved under different location when such write fails for later 
reads?
Failed read marks sector in BBL too? 

I am surprised to notice that I have plenty of sectors in BBL in some arrays 
which SMART reports be quite healthy, and all members passing short/long SMART 
tests ...  
 
-- 
Mateusz Korniak
"(...) mam brata - poważny, domator, liczykrupa, hipokryta, pobożniś,
 	krótko mówiąc - podpora społeczeństwa."
				Nikos Kazantzakis - "Grek Zorba"

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux