Re: [PATCH 3/3] Safeguard against writing to an active device of another node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Goldwyn,
>> Probably something like that - yes.  Unfortunately your mailer messed
>> that up more that usual make it rather difficult to apply.
>>
>> I was wondering if we could make it a run-time dependency though .. a
>> bit like get_cluster_name.  We can still do that later I guess.  I'm
>> not really sure what is best at the moment.
>>
>
>
> Yes, I would second that: Making these functions a run-time
> dependency. We should have the ability for it to work by just
> installing libdlm (with the proper flags set), rather than recompiling
> the package for cluster features.
>
NP, I should take a look at get_cluster_name first.

Thanks,
Guoqing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux