Re: [PATCH 2/8] md/raid5: Ensure a batch member is not handled prematurely.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 27 May 2015 08:35:32 +1000 NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Could you please review and possibly test the patch below?
> 

well... that patch had a fairly obvious double-lock bug.
Try this one.
(oh, just saw your email that you spotted the lock bug :-)


NeilBrown

From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 08:43:45 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] md/raid5: close race between STRIPE_BIT_DELAY and batching.

The first time a write is added to a stripe, we need to set the
bitmap bits (if a bitmap is active).
While doing that the stripe is not locked and other writes could
be added and then the stripe could be added to a batch.
Once it has entered the batch it is too large to set STRIPE_BIT_DELAY
as the batch head has taken over when the stripe will be written.

We cannot hold the spinlock while adding the bitmap bit,
so introduce a new stripe_head flag 'STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING' which
indicates that adding to the bitmap is pending.  This prevents
the stripe from being added to a batch.

Only the first thread to add a write to a stripe can set this bit,
so it is safe for it to clear it again when it is done.

Reported-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 73b5376dad3b..dae587ecdf71 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ static void unlock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2)
 static bool stripe_can_batch(struct stripe_head *sh)
 {
 	return test_bit(STRIPE_BATCH_READY, &sh->state) &&
+		!test_bit(STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING, &sh->state) &&
 		is_full_stripe_write(sh);
 }
 
@@ -3007,14 +3008,27 @@ static int add_stripe_bio(struct stripe_head *sh, struct bio *bi, int dd_idx,
 	pr_debug("added bi b#%llu to stripe s#%llu, disk %d.\n",
 		(unsigned long long)(*bip)->bi_iter.bi_sector,
 		(unsigned long long)sh->sector, dd_idx);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
 
 	if (conf->mddev->bitmap && firstwrite) {
+		/* Cannot hold spinlock over bitmap_startwrite,
+		 * but must ensure this isn't added to a batch until
+		 * we have added to the bitmap and set bm_seq.
+		 * So set STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING to prevent
+		 * batching.
+		 * Only the first thread to add a write to a stripe
+		 * can set this bit, so we "own" it.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON(test_bit(STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING, &sh->state));
+		set_bit(STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING, &sh->state);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
 		bitmap_startwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
 				  STRIPE_SECTORS, 0);
+		spin_lock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
+		clear_bit(STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING, &sh->state);
 		sh->bm_seq = conf->seq_flush+1;
 		set_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state);
 	}
+	spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
 
 	if (stripe_can_batch(sh))
 		stripe_add_to_batch_list(conf, sh);
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
index d7b2bc8b756f..02c3bf8fbfe7 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
@@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ enum {
 	STRIPE_ON_RELEASE_LIST,
 	STRIPE_BATCH_READY,
 	STRIPE_BATCH_ERR,
+	STRIPE_BITMAP_PENDING,	/* Being added to bitmap, don't add
+				 * to batch yet.
+				 */
 };
 
 #define STRIPE_EXPAND_SYNC_FLAGS \

Attachment: pgpt6XREfhRq0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux