[PATCH 2/8] md/raid5: Ensure a batch member is not handled prematurely.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If a stripe is a member of a batch, but not the head, it must
not be handled separately from the rest of the batch.

'clear_batch_ready()' handles this requirement to some
extent but not completely.  If a member is passed to handle_stripe()
a second time it returns '0' indicating the stripe can be handled,
which is wrong.
So add an extra test.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index c3ccefbd4fe7..9a803b735848 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -4192,9 +4192,13 @@ static void analyse_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
 
 static int clear_batch_ready(struct stripe_head *sh)
 {
+	/* Return '1' if this is a member of batch, or
+	 * '0' if it is a lone stripe or a head which can now be
+	 * handled.
+	 */
 	struct stripe_head *tmp;
 	if (!test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_BATCH_READY, &sh->state))
-		return 0;
+		return (sh->batch_head && sh->batch_head != sh);
 	spin_lock(&sh->stripe_lock);
 	if (!sh->batch_head) {
 		spin_unlock(&sh->stripe_lock);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux