Re: mdadm RAID6 "active" with spares and failed disks; need help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 21:59:38 -0400
Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I read through this.  Given all of the destructive actions you took, I
> am doubtful you will ever get your data.  Like mounting "readonly".
> That gives you a readonly filesystem, but it writes to the device.
> Possibly a great deal if there's a journal to replay.

Are you sure, which FS does that? I remember some discussion on FS lists
(Btrfs?), and IIRC the consensus and the implemented behavior was that the
device shouldn't ever be touched with writes on RO mounts, no matter what.

-- 
With respect,
Roman

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux