Re: mdadm RAID6 "active" with spares and failed disks; need help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/01/15 23:22, Valentijn Sessink wrote:
> Also, I would not have dared to run all these statements on "live" (or
> dead, for that matter ;-) disks.

I'm no expert either, but looking at the blog, I'm worried he might have
trashed the array with almost the first thing he did :-(

"add" says it will add a drive as spare if it didn't originally belong
to the array. If it adds a spare to a degraded array, the array will
immediately start to repair itself.

OOPS!!! As it sounds like exactly this could have happened - mdadm
didn't recognise the disk as it added it.

Just speculating, but unfortunately this seems quite likely :-(

Cheers,
Wol
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux