On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:09:36PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:48:03 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:27:46AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > I've moved blk_flush_plug to the beginning of the function. > > > > > > > I wondered if it really make sense to call blk_flush_plug with nr_iowait > > > > elevated and delayacct_blkio active. blk_flush_plug() could call schedule() > > > > for non-"io" reasons and maybe that could upset stuff??? > > > > > > Yeah, good question that. Lemme ponder that a bit. > > > > Yes, I thikn your version makes most sense as, you say, even regular > > schedule() call nested in my version would go towards blk delayacct -- > > and I doubt that was the intent; even though the current kernel works > > that way. > > > > I'll move the now rudimentary io_schedule() into sched.h as an inline. > > Thanks. > > Are you OK with this going to -stable for 3.19? OK, lets do that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
