Same issue likely. On 7/22/2012 5:22 PM, Jaromir Capik wrote: >>> Likewise, if the checksumming you request is implemented in >>> md/RAID1, > > Btw. I like what Roberto proposed ... this could be a completely > independent layer having it's own device file. MD RAID1 would > be then built on top of such safe device files. The only thing > to be implemented directly in the RAID1 would be that immediate > resyncing in case of discovered read error received from such > safety layer. And this immediate resyncing could/should be > optional ... > > Jaromir. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
