On 28 May 2012 12:03, Igor M Podlesny <for.poige+lsr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 28 May 2012 10:54, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] >> The best indicator is total time that it takes (which can probably be >> extracted from logs as start and end are logged). Divide that into size of a >> device to get average MB/sec. If the bitmap was used, that will normally be >> much less the best throughput of the device. > > That's exactly why I am stating it didn't use WIBs 2 times of 3. It > went resyncing from beginning till the end -- I had my finger on its > pulse. :) > > I can't promise (due to popular "lack of time" disease, yeah), but > if I'll get on it using VirtualBox or real environment [Lord forbid > :)] once again, I'll let you know, sure. Here it is: http://pastie.org/4118133 — 3.4.2-rt10 went suspend ok for 2 times, the 3rd it didn't. Reboot, resync, no bitmaps use. And, BTW, it's rather slow in despite of having max. stripe_cache_size set. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
