Re: Hi! Strange issue with LSR -- bitmaps hadn't been used during 2 of 3 RAIDs resync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28 May 2012 09:45, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 00:10:33 +0800 Igor M Podlesny <for.poige+lsr@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> On 27 May 2012 20:00, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 27 May 2012 19:32:40 +0800 Igor M Podlesny <for.poige+lsr@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >>    A power outage has happened to system (which was in "suspend"
>> >> state) with RAID-10, RAID-5 and RAID-6. Later on boot, RAID-10 was
>> >> fast re-synced using bitmap, but both RAID-5 and RAID-6 were in
>> >> auto-readonly mode with resync=DELAYED. When they flipped to
>> >> Read-Write, LSR started re-syncing not using bitmaps seemingly. A bug?
>> >
>> > Maybe.  But with so little detail it is hard to say.
>> > What made you think the bitmaps weren't being used?
>>
>>    Well, it is reasonable to assume that host being put in suspend
>> mode wouldn't have much not synced data at all. RAID-10 had been
>> progressing its resync quite fast, it was obvious that it had been
>> using bitmaps for that. Moreover — RAID-10 was the most I/O active
>> comparing to others, AFAIR.
>
> Unfortunately vague statements about "it was obvious" or "AFAIR" don't really
> help in analysing a situation to find any bugs.
> I can only really work with concrete facts.  Without them I cannot help.

   Well, than probably you could tell me how one does find out whether
recovery uses WIB, or it doesn't? :-) I mean aside from vague
estimating based on watching re-sync progressing and considering
overall time it finally took to complete.

>>    P. s. Oh, and BTW, I see 2.6.18 supplied by RedHat still has the
>> bug causing kernel panic when using WIB -- couldn't you please point
>> out is it due to they're missing some important bugfix you made later?
>
> I have no time or interest for submiting bug reports to distros that I don't
> use.  If the presence of the bug concerns you, I suggest you report it.

   I thought you could have some recollections bout this rather nasty
behavior. It has nothing to do with bug-reports for RedHat since
vanilla 2.6.18 for sure has the same bug, and hopefully it has been
fixed in later releases -- that was the only thing I was asking you
about. But your competent suggestions are also appreciated, of course.

--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux