On 28 May 2012 10:54, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > The best indicator is total time that it takes (which can probably be > extracted from logs as start and end are logged). Divide that into size of a > device to get average MB/sec. If the bitmap was used, that will normally be > much less the best throughput of the device. That's exactly why I am stating it didn't use WIBs 2 times of 3. It went resyncing from beginning till the end -- I had my finger on its pulse. :) I can't promise (due to popular "lack of time" disease, yeah), but if I'll get on it using VirtualBox or real environment [Lord forbid :)] once again, I'll let you know, sure. [...] > 2.6.18 is a long time ago. I don't really have any recollections - so many > bugs, so many releases. I'm not even entirely sure what bug you are > referring to. I would probably have tagged any patch for it to be included > in -stable, but I cannot be certain without looking more deeply. Okay, thanks, it gonna take some kind of bisecting I guess, then. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
