> I'm sure that LV's could be defragmented - there is already code to move > them around on the disks (such as to move them out of a PV before deleting > the PV). ÂI don't know why it hasn't been implemented - maybe there are too > few people working on LVM, or that it is a low priority, or that LV > fragmentation makes very little measurable difference in practice. I've always figured it was because fragmentation in the LV's caused little performance degradation. If we were talking about LV's composed of hundreds of fragments I would expect to see degradation but I've never come across a scenario where LV's have been that bad. Someone refered to DOS in an earlier post and I think that's a good example of relevance. I maintain a bunch of Windows based machines at work and I did some performance benchmarking between a traditional defrag utility and some of the "professional" versions. Bells and whistles aside, what set most of the Pro versions apart from the standard defrag utilities was the concept of "good enough" defrag, which basically puts files into several larger fragments as opposed to a complete defrag. I ran tests on filesystem performance before and after defraging drives with both options and the change in performance between a full defrag and a "good enough" defrag was minimal. -- Drew "Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood." --Marie Curie "This started out as a hobby and spun horribly out of control." -Unknown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
