now, a question.... if raid1 is like raid10 (one disk = raid0) why not only one raid1 (raid10) software implementation? for example, if i have 4 disks and i want 4 mirrors. why not work with only raid10? why the option since we have all features of raid1 inside raid10? is it to allow small source code (a small ARM rom)? memory usage? cpu usage? easy to implement? 2011/1/31 Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > =] hehehe there is no standard for linux, just the linux standard that > was implemented :P > linux raid10 work and is the same idea of the 'raid10' academic standard > i don´t know any raid standard, just hardware based standard > you can´t get a smart array(hp) disk and put on a perc(dell) or linux > mdadm and wait it will work without tweaking... > > > 2011/1/31 Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Before this goes any further, why not just reference the excellent >> Wikipedia article (actually, excellent applies to both Wikipedia *and* >> the article): >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_RAID_levels#Linux_MD_RAID_10 >> >> The only problem I have with the wikipedia article is the assertion >> that Linux MD RAID 10 is non-standard. It's as standard as anything >> else is in this world. >> >> >> -- >> Jon >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > > > -- > Roberto Spadim > Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial > -- Roberto Spadim Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
