Re: Hi! Why having LSR's chunk size 2^n limitation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19 January 2011 00:11, John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 18/01/2011 15:59, Igor Podlesny wrote:
[...]
> You're slightly confusing things. Stripe size and chunk size are different
> things, but related. Stripe size = number of data discs * chunk size. Linux
[...]

   Am I? Take a look
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=vinum&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+4.9-RELEASE&format=html
   Also man mkfs.xfs is recommended too.

   (I wonder how would ya imagine 4k stripe sized RAID-5. Really worth
looking at. :-)

> Secondly, as far as I know all Linux filesystems are RAID-aware so know how

   You're mistaken. There're too many are not. Also, don't forget
LVM-2 in middle.

> to distribute their superblocks and other metadata evenly across all the
> discs, so they've already got any performance improvement that might be had.
>
> Cheers,
>
> John.

   P. S. I think now everyone can see why this letter was
intentionally addressed to the author of LSR, not to the list.

-- 
End of message. Next message?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux