like this patch (a long time ago) http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg30003.html 2011/1/18 Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > hi guys, could we implement a load_balance read algorithm for SSD? > nearest head isn't as fast as round robin for ssd. > i'm talking about raid1 (raid10 too) > what's my problem? > as i can see, raid0 is faster than raid1 > for example: > two disks raid0 is faster than > two disks raid1. > > why? > nearest head > instead of a balanced read algorithm (like raid0) the nearest head > make raid1 use only one disk for searchs where we could use two disks > (like raid0) > > could we implement a round robin for ssd? and make raid1 as fast as > raid0 for ssd? > i didn't tested the raid10 algorithm yet. > thanks a lot. > > -- > Roberto Spadim > Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial > -- Roberto Spadim Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
