hi guys, could we implement a load_balance read algorithm for SSD? nearest head isn't as fast as round robin for ssd. i'm talking about raid1 (raid10 too) what's my problem? as i can see, raid0 is faster than raid1 for example: two disks raid0 is faster than two disks raid1. why? nearest head instead of a balanced read algorithm (like raid0) the nearest head make raid1 use only one disk for searchs where we could use two disks (like raid0) could we implement a round robin for ssd? and make raid1 as fast as raid0 for ssd? i didn't tested the raid10 algorithm yet. thanks a lot. -- Roberto Spadim Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
