On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:28:21 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:11:28 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:00:00 +0100 Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Manually added spares are not used due to fact that they not added to md configuration.
> > > Counters are updated only.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 ++++--
> > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > > index a2087c7..59c4150 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > > @@ -5592,8 +5592,10 @@ static int raid5_start_reshape(mddev_t *mddev)
> > > } else if (rdev->raid_disk >= conf->previous_raid_disks
> > > && !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
> > > /* This is a spare that was manually added */
> > > - set_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
> > > - added_devices++;
> > > + if (raid5_add_disk(mddev, rdev) == 0) {
> > > + set_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
> > > + added_devices++;
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* When a reshape changes the number of devices, ->degraded
> >
> > This should not be needed.
> > When a device is manually added, the desired slot number is written to
> > ..../md/dev-XXX/slot
> >
> > This calls slot_store (in md.c) which call mddev->pers->hot_add_disk which
> > for raid5 is raid5_add_disk.
> > So you shouldn't need to call raid5_add_disk again.
> >
>
> ahhh... I see. raid5_add_disk doesn't do the right thing in that case. It
> actually indexes beyond the end of an array, which is bad.
>
> We possibly do need the raid5_add_disk where you had put it. I'll have a
> think and see what is best.
On third thoughts, I cannot see the problem you are seeing.
I even did some simple testing (manually writing to things in sysfs) and it
seems to include the new device properly.
There are some issues that I found which are address by the following patch,
but it isn't clear to me that any of them relate to what you are seeing.
Maybe if you could be more specific about what you see happening?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 3194a80..cd4cccd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -5585,6 +5585,8 @@ static int update_raid_disks(mddev_t *mddev, int raid_disks)
mddev->delta_disks = raid_disks - mddev->raid_disks;
rv = mddev->pers->check_reshape(mddev);
+ if (rv < 0)
+ mddev->delta_disks = 0;
return rv;
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 5044bab..2902454 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -5527,8 +5527,8 @@ static int raid5_start_reshape(mddev_t *mddev)
return -ENOSPC;
list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set)
- if ((rdev->raid_disk < 0 || rdev->raid_disk >= conf->raid_disks)
- && !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
+ if (!test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)
+ && !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
spares++;
if (spares - mddev->degraded < mddev->delta_disks - conf->max_degraded)
@@ -5571,7 +5571,7 @@ static int raid5_start_reshape(mddev_t *mddev)
* to correctly record the "partially reconstructed" state of
* such devices during the reshape and confusion could result.
*/
- if (mddev->delta_disks >= 0)
+ if (mddev->delta_disks >= 0) {
list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set)
if (rdev->raid_disk < 0 &&
!test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
@@ -5586,8 +5586,7 @@ static int raid5_start_reshape(mddev_t *mddev)
if (sysfs_create_link(&mddev->kobj,
&rdev->kobj, nm))
/* Failure here is OK */;
- } else
- break;
+ }
} else if (rdev->raid_disk >= conf->previous_raid_disks
&& !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
/* This is a spare that was manually added */
@@ -5595,14 +5594,14 @@ static int raid5_start_reshape(mddev_t *mddev)
added_devices++;
}
- /* When a reshape changes the number of devices, ->degraded
- * is measured against the larger of the pre and post number of
- * devices.*/
- if (mddev->delta_disks > 0) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
- mddev->degraded += (conf->raid_disks - conf->previous_raid_disks)
- - added_devices;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
+ /* When a reshape changes the number of devices,
+ * ->degraded is measured against the larger of the pre
+ * and post number of devices.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
+ mddev->degraded += (conf->raid_disks - conf->previous_raid_disks)
+ - added_devices;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
}
mddev->raid_disks = conf->raid_disks;
mddev->reshape_position = conf->reshape_progress;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
