Re: [dm-devel] linux-next - WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824 bd_link_disk_holder+0x92/0x1ac()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/13/2011 03:43 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:

>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Milan Broz <mbroz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Maybe, but this was not invented in DM/MD camp:-)
>>> Probably Kay or Greg can answer why it was done this way?
> 
> It's not from Greg or Kay. It just appeared some day in the context of dm. :)

ah, then sorry, I am just confused:-)
But DM does not need it for operation at all so it must had some other reason.
(We have dmsetup ls --tree using dm-ioctls for years.)

> And yes, symlinks *look* nice and simple for the outside, but they are
> not, and have all sorts of problems like non-atomic updates, make it
> impossible to ever rename a device (as long as they copy the device
> name), and and and .... we should not add more of this.

Yes, I agree, if there is better way, let's switch to that.

Milan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux