On 01/13/11 09:23, Milan Broz wrote: > On 01/12/2011 06:34 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: >> Seen in a boot of yesterday's linux-next. The 'W' flag was due to the >> already-reported 'WARNING: at kernel/workqueue.c:1202 worker_enter_idle'. >> Not sure if it's a block_dev or dm/LVM issue, so I'm cc:'ing both groups. I wonder >> if the fact I still have 'CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=n' is involved (it's apparently ticking off >> dracut before and after the warning). >> >> [ 16.840333] dracut: Found volume group "vg_blackice" using metadata type lvm2 >> [ 16.892282] dracut: The link /dev/vg_blackice/opt should had been created by udev but it was not found. Falling back to direct link creation. >> [ 16.912627] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [ 16.912635] WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824 bd_link_disk_holder+0x92/0x1ac() > > That seems to be > WARN_ON_ONCE(!bdev->bd_holder || bdev->bd_holder_disk); > added in patch > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=e09b457bdb7e8d23fc54dcef0930ac697d8de895 > "block: simplify holder symlink handling" > > dm linear just claims device in table constructor, I don't think it is bug in DM code. The patch assumes only one holder disk for a claimed dev, which is not true. E.g. if there are multiple LVs on a PV. In addition to that, since claiming is done in table constructor, there can be 2 claim instances for a slave/holder pair at a time when you load a table while there's already an active one. E.g. if you do lvresize. We need consideration for this, too. Thanks, -- Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
