RE: [PATCH 2/2] IMSM: do not rebuild the array if a non-redundant sub-array with failed disks is present

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >
> > This seems to imply that there are only ever at most 2 volumes in a
> > container.  Is that really true?  The rest of the code seems to
> assume
> > that
> > there could be several.
> 
> 
> There are at most two sub-array in one array.
> 
One correction. As I said in legacy imsm there at most two volumes, however, there is an assumption 
that in IMSM_NO_PLATFORM mode it should support more then 2.
So this needs to be corrected, too.
Marcin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux