Re: raid5+hotspare: request for recommended procedure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 2010-09-29 12:03, schrieb Tim Small:

> Run smartctl -t long, and see what the LBA of the errors are (smartctl
> -a when finished, and look at the error log) - it may be that it is
> outside of the used space (e.g. right at the end of the drive - I've
> seen this in the past) if this is the case, you can just dd over it.
> 
> If the test completes without error then the unreadable sector is either
> not user-addressable, or doesn't really exist, in which case I'd ignore
> it (or perhaps a security-erase will get the drive back into a sensible
> state).  Some of the earlier firmwares for the ST3250310NS were a little
> buggy in my experience, so you might want to look at upgrading it
> (latest Seagate non-OEM firmware is SN06), which can be done with hdparm.

Yep, it finished without error!

Does that mean I could ignore that safely?

Or should I rebuild the raids onto the spare-disk and then swap drive?

S
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux