Re: OT: sas controllers/expanders and "desktop" drives?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matt Garman wrote:

As for RAID usage (md or hardware): just to be clear, my
understanding is that the biggest problem is that, even if the
desktop drives work fine for non-RAID use, they'll still be
"difficult" in an array.  That is, they take too long to report
errors, and thus get kicked out of the array.

Another important, (from a performance perspective), feature of the enterprise drives which will be factor in your setup, is that they are optimised for use in a high vibration environment (RAFF in Western Digital parlance), unlike desktop drives.

The following illustrates the problem in a somewhat humourous way:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDacjrSCeq4

While the desktop drives will work, throughput and seek times may be compromised due to vibration and resonance effects from many drives in one enclosure.

Regards,

Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux