Re: RAID MIA. Again. (Kinda.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, March 4, 2010 5:21 pm, Michael Evans wrote:
> Try providing the output of;
> for ii in /dev/[sh]d[a-z] ; do parted $ii print ; done

Mea culpa; I'd said:

 I went through all 24 permutations of
 mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 /dev/sdd2
 since I wasn't sure if the drive order was significant.  All of them
 "worked," inasmuch as they created /dev/md0, but in all cases it was
 partitionless.

Which I assumed implied that /dev/sd[a-d]2 was valid on all disks, though,
in hindsight, I wasn't explicit.  So: /dev/sd[a-d]2 exists on all drives
as partition id "fd" (Linux raid autodetect).  It's /dev/md0 that shows as
a valid, 4.4 TB disk... with no partition.

-Ken


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux