Though I may not be able to help, but I'm sure you'd get much better support & help if you choose a proper subject summarizing the problem. If possible, I suggest you clone each disk to another disk before proceeding just in case something goes further wrong. Maybe the array you recreated was with the wrong chunksize of 512 instead of your desired 256? On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Alex Boag-Munroe <boagenator@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4 March 2010 12:22, Alex Boag-Munroe <boagenator@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 4 March 2010 12:01, John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 04/03/2010 11:30, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guys... >>>> >>>> Yes I am an idiot. I was changing the chunk size of my RAID5 array >>>> last night from 64kb to 256kb and left it running overnight. During >>>> the night we had a power outage. >>>> >>>> This is where the idiot part comes in. The backup file is on a >>>> filesystem that's part of the RAID5 array, so obviously I am unable to >>>> start it. I completely forgot the filesystem I specified for >>>> --backup-file was part of the same array. >>>> >>>> Once you're all done pointing and laughing, can you let me know if I >>>> am totally screwed? I've a lot of data here that I -really- don't >>>> want to lose... >>>> >>>> Please help.. >>>> >>>> Idiot. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex Boag-Munroe >>>> >>>> Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine. >>> >>> OK, I was done pointing and laughing, until I saw your signature. Did you >>> choose that on purpose or did Gmail pick it for you? >>> >>> I'm afraid I can't help with your problem, except to say that I've a feeling >>> you ought to be able to manually restart the half-reshaped array without the >>> backup file, so the worst case ought to be that you might lose one backup >>> file's worth of data. However, kernel and mdadm versions together with >>> output of `mdadm --detail` of your md device and `mdadm --examine` of its >>> constituent devices will help those more knowledgeable than me tell you what >>> to do next. If you're lucky the boss, Neil Brown, will help but I imagine >>> he's asleep right now since he lives in Australia and it's the middle of the >>> night there. >>> >>> Best of luck, >>> >>> John. >>> >> >> Hi John, thanks so much for your reply. >> >> That is my signature and I stand by it, hence the whole "me idiot" and >> not DEMANDING I get help etc. >> >> mdadm is version 3.1.1. New developments. I found a post on the >> internet where Neil recommended to someone to recreate the array >> without erasing it. Which I have done, mdadm starts the array and >> mdadm -D shows that almost a terabyte of space is in use. >> >> However, mdadm -D also shows a chunk size of 512k, which is neither >> the 64k original chunk nor the 512k I asked for. >> >> Kernel version is gentoo-sources-2.6.33. >> >> Output of mdadm --examine for /dev/sda5 through /dev/sdd5: >> >> /dev/sda5: >> Magic : a92b4efc >> Version : 0.90.00 >> UUID : 17862986:014cb4c0:ffe6e849:786ed339 (local to host ncc-1701-e) >> Creation Time : Thu Mar 4 13:10:24 2010 >> Raid Level : raid5 >> Used Dev Size : 974767616 (929.61 GiB 998.16 GB) >> Array Size : 2924302848 (2788.83 GiB 2994.49 GB) >> Raid Devices : 4 >> Total Devices : 4 >> Preferred Minor : 1 >> >> Update Time : Thu Mar 4 13:10:29 2010 >> State : clean >> Active Devices : 4 >> Working Devices : 4 >> Failed Devices : 0 >> Spare Devices : 0 >> Checksum : b951290 - correct >> Events : 3 >> >> Layout : left-symmetric >> Chunk Size : 512K >> >> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State >> this 0 8 5 0 active sync /dev/sda5 >> >> 0 0 8 5 0 active sync /dev/sda5 >> 1 1 8 21 1 active sync /dev/sdb5 >> 2 2 8 37 2 active sync /dev/sdc5 >> 3 3 8 53 3 active sync /dev/sdd5 >> /dev/sdb5: >> Magic : a92b4efc >> Version : 0.90.00 >> UUID : 17862986:014cb4c0:ffe6e849:786ed339 (local to host ncc-1701-e) >> Creation Time : Thu Mar 4 13:10:24 2010 >> Raid Level : raid5 >> Used Dev Size : 974767616 (929.61 GiB 998.16 GB) >> Array Size : 2924302848 (2788.83 GiB 2994.49 GB) >> Raid Devices : 4 >> Total Devices : 4 >> Preferred Minor : 1 >> >> Update Time : Thu Mar 4 13:10:29 2010 >> State : clean >> Active Devices : 4 >> Working Devices : 4 >> Failed Devices : 0 >> Spare Devices : 0 >> Checksum : b9512a2 - correct >> Events : 3 >> >> Layout : left-symmetric >> Chunk Size : 512K >> >> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State >> this 1 8 21 1 active sync /dev/sdb5 >> >> 0 0 8 5 0 active sync /dev/sda5 >> 1 1 8 21 1 active sync /dev/sdb5 >> 2 2 8 37 2 active sync /dev/sdc5 >> 3 3 8 53 3 active sync /dev/sdd5 >> /dev/sdc5: >> Magic : a92b4efc >> Version : 0.90.00 >> UUID : 17862986:014cb4c0:ffe6e849:786ed339 (local to host ncc-1701-e) >> Creation Time : Thu Mar 4 13:10:24 2010 >> Raid Level : raid5 >> Used Dev Size : 974767616 (929.61 GiB 998.16 GB) >> Array Size : 2924302848 (2788.83 GiB 2994.49 GB) >> Raid Devices : 4 >> Total Devices : 4 >> Preferred Minor : 1 >> >> Update Time : Thu Mar 4 13:10:29 2010 >> State : clean >> Active Devices : 4 >> Working Devices : 4 >> Failed Devices : 0 >> Spare Devices : 0 >> Checksum : b9512b4 - correct >> Events : 3 >> >> Layout : left-symmetric >> Chunk Size : 512K >> >> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State >> this 2 8 37 2 active sync /dev/sdc5 >> >> 0 0 8 5 0 active sync /dev/sda5 >> 1 1 8 21 1 active sync /dev/sdb5 >> 2 2 8 37 2 active sync /dev/sdc5 >> 3 3 8 53 3 active sync /dev/sdd5 >> /dev/sdd5: >> Magic : a92b4efc >> Version : 0.90.00 >> UUID : 17862986:014cb4c0:ffe6e849:786ed339 (local to host ncc-1701-e) >> Creation Time : Thu Mar 4 13:10:24 2010 >> Raid Level : raid5 >> Used Dev Size : 974767616 (929.61 GiB 998.16 GB) >> Array Size : 2924302848 (2788.83 GiB 2994.49 GB) >> Raid Devices : 4 >> Total Devices : 4 >> Preferred Minor : 1 >> >> Update Time : Thu Mar 4 13:10:29 2010 >> State : clean >> Active Devices : 4 >> Working Devices : 4 >> Failed Devices : 0 >> Spare Devices : 0 >> Checksum : b9512c6 - correct >> Events : 3 >> >> Layout : left-symmetric >> Chunk Size : 512K >> >> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State >> this 3 8 53 3 active sync /dev/sdd5 >> >> 0 0 8 5 0 active sync /dev/sda5 >> 1 1 8 21 1 active sync /dev/sdb5 >> 2 2 8 37 2 active sync /dev/sdc5 >> 3 3 8 53 3 active sync /dev/sdd5 >> >> Booting with autodetecting raid, states that there's no valid 0.9 superblock. >> >> -- >> Alex Boag-Munroe >> >> Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine. >> > > Oops. Where I said "it isn't the 512k chunk I asked for" I meant 256k chunk. > > Thanks again > > -- > Alex Boag-Munroe > > Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Majed B. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
