Hi, > What's confusing is that /proc/mdadm lists it as an active member > (synced to data) but that the device does not match. Maybe you can > stop/restart the array? thank for the support. I tried to stop/start, incremental assembly (in different order), fail/remove/add of both components (once at time, of course), but this information seems to be stable. The only thing I did not try was to fail/remove one HDD, zero the superblock, add it again. Anyway, it seems Neil explained this is a bug of mdadm, so I hope this will be fixed in the next Fedora upgrade. Thanks again, bye, -- piergiorgio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
