Re: Device role question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Piergiorgio Sartor
<piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> checking randomly the component of some RAID-10 arrays
> (two disks each), with "mdadm -E /dev/sdXY", I noticed
> the following.
>
> There is an entry reported, called "Device Role".
>
> On one array, the components are defined, respectively, as:
>
> Active device 0
> Active device 1
>
> On another two arrays, it's a bit different.
>
> Active device 0
> spare
>
> Why is it "spare" (all are RAID-10 f2)?
>
> Does it make any difference one or the other role, in
> this type of RAID?
>
> On the other hand, "mdadm -D /dev/mdX" does not seem
> to give any hint on the different roles.
>
> Thanks,
>
> bye,
>
> --
>
> piergiorgio
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Spare should mean that it is not currently a synced member of the
array; in other words a hot-spare.  As I recall raid10 cannot
currently be grown (or /may/ only be grown with VERY recent
tools+kernels); did you maybe create a single device raid10 and try to
grow it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux