also sprach Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010.02.18.1037 +1300]: > > the assembly time would probably be the same, but the initramfs being > > proposed did not include that time either. > > This was the *only* time that was included. Quoting myself: If you are discussing boot times rather than mdadm, might I suggest you change the subject line? Upstream is keen on finally dropping kernel autoassembly, and I support that because of the gained flexibility. Boot times are important for laptops and desktops, which are hardly the primary target of RAID. Anyway, this is FLOSS. If you want kernel autoassembly, take over the code and bring it up to speed. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "what's your conceptual continuity? -- well, it should be easy to see: the crux of the bisquit is the apopstrophe!" -- frank zappa spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
