On 02/17/2010 10:46 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > well at the moment it takes less than two seconds until init takes over. > > Adding .5 seconds is a lot. And loading the initrd and changing root isn't > free either, true? > > I remember well all the noise in the past about making linux booting faster. > So why slow it down with an initrd - especially if you can do without? > Note that an extremely lightweight initramfs can quite possibly be faster than doing it in the kernel, just because userspace is so much less constrained. I was hoping klibc would catch on for this stuff, but it hasn't as much as I'd like. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
