Re: RAID partition starting sector (... 63?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Kristleifur Daðason
<kristleifur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember seeing some discussion on what sector a partition starts
> on. Many programs create partitions that start on sector 63, which
> doesn't really make any intuitive sense to me. I just lost a disk from
> of a RAID10 array and was thinking I'd try to understand this issue as
> I have to do some disk/block/partition wrangling anyway.
>
> From a discussion from linux-raid titled "Raid 10 LVM JFS Seeking
> performance help", I found the following:
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
> <goswin-v-b@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Also, on a lower level, make sure your raid does not start on a
>> partition starting at sector 63 (which is still the default in many
>> partitioning progs). That easily results in bad alignment causing 4k
>> chunks to land on 2 sectors. But you need to test that with your
>> specific drive to see if it really is a problem.
>>
>
> Hmm ... In short: Do I want to have a partition start on any
> particular sector? Especially in the case where I want to ...
> - build a RAID10 with partitions (i.e. not with raw devices)
> - using ~256K chunks
> - and have a nice JFS filesystem on top of it.
>
> Starting on sector 64 feels conceptually "prettier" than Sector 63,
> but I can't picture the case where it behaves any different. Except
> perhaps when GRUB expects stuff to begin at sector 63, making a mess
> if we're starting at sector 64. Though it *should* work OK, of course.
>
> Anyways ... Any tips on a subtle matter most well appreciated.
> Especially tell me if I'm overthinking, please. Thanks.
>
> -- Kristleifur

I believe a better choice is to start at 1 MB regardless of sector
size.  This was initiated by Vista moving to that a few years ago so
you will almost always find hardware, etc.  That assumes your sector
size is still based on a power of two.

If you do get a 4K sector drive be sure it is 1MB aligned (ie. Vista mode).

The only shipping drives I know of are the WD ones and they have a
jumper for sector 63 aligned and 1MB aligned.  In a raid using sector
63 alignment would really make it hard to keep track of things.

There are rumors the future drives may come from the factory
pre-configured for one or the other, so if that turns into reality be
sure to buy the 1MB aligned drives.

Greg
-- 
Greg Freemyer
Head of EDD Tape Extraction and Processing team
Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer
Preservation and Forensic processing of Exchange Repositories White Paper -
<http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/tng_whitepaper_fpe.html>

The Norcross Group
The Intersection of Evidence & Technology
http://www.norcrossgroup.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux