Re: feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I think the 4k sector size on WD20EARS (for instance) is supposed to add more ECC information but I'm not sure how this will affect the 10^14 error rate. I think the manufacturers need to work a bit more on it, I don't see how these drives can be used in single drive configuration with the current 10^14 value.

I don't have experience with any other drives than the WD20EADS but they develop read errors at a rate higher than any other drive I've experienced before....

We are thinking about buying a large number of WD2002FYPS RE4-GP for a large array (raid-6)

Anyone knows if the error rate is so high on those drives too?
Do they also use 4k sectors? Mikael, how do you find this out?

Is the 4k sectors a RMW emulation as written in
   http://lwn.net/Articles/322777/
or Linux sees them really as 4k block devices?
And if it's the second, were there side effects on this?

Thank you
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux