Re: No resync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robin Hill wrote:

You probably need to start it with missing members then, so it's able to
run but not to resync.

This is not an option in assemble mode either. It looks as though the array has to be recreated. I'm not sure why any of these options are not provided for assemble.

Anyway, in the end I did an "assemble --force" after stopping what was left (5 drives dropped from a 16 drive RAID6), and it strated but did not initiate a resync.

Perhaps the behaviour here has changed, because I'm sure when I've done this in the past, it resyncs straight away.

There were some somewhat strange errors in the log:

Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdf, sector 1953182527
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Disk failure on sdf1, disabling device.
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Operation continuing on 15 devices.
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdh, sector 1953182527
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Disk failure on sdh1, disabling device.
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Operation continuing on 14 devices.
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdg, sector 1953182527
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Disk failure on sdg1, disabling device.
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Operation continuing on 13 devices.
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdp, sector 1953182527
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Disk failure on sdp1, disabling device.
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Operation continuing on 12 devices.
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdr, sector 1953182527
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Disk failure on sdr1, disabling device.
Jan 12 17:09:09 sam kernel: raid5: Operation continuing on 11 devices.

The cause is a controller problem, but after the first 2 drives were disabled, I don't know why there were "raid5: Operation continuing on..." messages as another 3 drives were offlined. A RAID6 array should stop when a third device fails.

Regards,

Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux