RE: Can I skip recovery for RAID5 in this way?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am not sure recover slows down . But for sure degraded mode performance will be lower, especially read performance will be worse as data need to be recovered/computed. Same with recovery mode for read. But write performance should not affected. May be I am wrong.

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of hank peng
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 8:24 PM
To: linux-raid
Subject: Can I skip recovery for RAID5 in this way?

For my platform, recovery when creating a raid5 array or adding a new
disk to a degraded raid5 array is not only time-consuming but also cpu
cost. I am thinking now when every write into a raid5 stripe, if we
only use reconstruct_write method, can I use this way to skip
recovery?
BTW, my appliation mainly focus on sequential write and I can also
limit the number of disks in raid5.
Please correct me if I am wrong, maybe my way is stupid.

-- 
The simplest is not all best but the best is surely the simplest!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����w��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux