Re: Can I skip recovery for RAID5 in this way?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dnia 2010-01-09, sob o godzinie 12:23 +0800, hank peng pisze:
> Please correct me if I am wrong, maybe my way is stupid.

You'd lose redundancy this way. If any of the other disks fail, there
would be not enough data to recover.

-- 
Cheers
Michał (Saviq) Sawicz

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: To jest =?UTF-8?Q?cz=C4=99=C5=9B=C4=87?= =?UTF-8?Q?_wiadomo=C5=9Bci?= podpisana cyfrowo


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux