Re: Alignment of RAID on specific boundary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/1/6 Michael Evans <mjevans1983@xxxxxxxxx>:
> <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Or move your partition start back by 136 sectors, or use version 0.90 or 1.0
>> superblocks which have the superblock at the end.
> Indeed, that was one route I covered earlier in my message.
>
> However it is still a good idea improvement for mdadm to allow the
> user to specify a non-default offset for the start of the
> data-partition (for a number of reasons).
>

Yes, it will be nice if Mr. Brown implements this when he finds
the time. I will use v1.0 as you both suggested till then.

Since i am experimenting in Virtualbox, i tried to
hexedit the superblock. I modified 0x80 (offset)
from 136 to 256 and subtracted 256-136=120
from 0x88 (size). It seems to work fine :)

Of course i did this because it is a test array in VB.
I wouldn't mess with the real array. I just wanted
to see if it will work.

Thank you all for your help.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux