anybody using the gc-ramdisk?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Has anybody tried using the GC-Ramdisk (aka iRAM -- four DDR DIMMs on a
PCI card with a battery backup)

  http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Storage/Products_Overview.aspx?ProductID=2180
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-RAM

Performance is much better than flash memories, but the price per
gigabyte is much greater and maximum capacity is far less.  It's really
closer to the nvram cache on a hardware raid card than an SSD.  The fact
that it loses data after 16 hours without power is a little worrisome,
although it uses a standard nimh battery so you can replace that with
something that lasts a lot longer...

Anyways, I'd be interested in hearing about anybody's experience with it.

I'm thinking of using this for my md write intent bitmap and ext4
journal, with "-o data=ordered" so close() and fsync() return as soon as
the data hits the DIMMs -- no need to wait for the disk to rotate around.

Any comments?

So often I hear debates about "hardware raid" versus "software raid"
which are actually debates over whether or not you ought to have some
sort of battery-backed write cache around.

  - a

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux