mark delfman wrote:
Some FS comparisons attached in pdf
not sure what to make of them as yet, but worth posting
I'm not sure either. Two things jump out.
1. Why is raw RAID0 read performance slower than write performance
2. Why is read performance with some file systems at or above raw
read performance?
For number one, does this indicate that write caching is actually On on
the drives?
Are all tests truly apples-apples comparisons or were there other
factors in there that aren't listed in the charts?
I guess these issues might not have a lot to do with your main question
but you might want to double-check the tests and numbers.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html