Re: MD write performance issue - found Catalyst patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



mark delfman wrote:
Some FS comparisons attached in pdf

not sure what to make of them as yet, but worth posting

I'm not sure either. Two things jump out.

   1. Why is raw RAID0 read performance slower than write performance
2. Why is read performance with some file systems at or above raw read performance?

For number one, does this indicate that write caching is actually On on the drives?

Are all tests truly apples-apples comparisons or were there other factors in there that aren't listed in the charts?

I guess these issues might not have a lot to do with your main question but you might want to double-check the tests and numbers.

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux