Re: Port Multipliers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:52 PM, David Rees wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Doug Ledford wrote:
I agree with this sentiment 100%. I don't have a good answer for why it topped out where it did, and that's one of the things I'm still trying to
get an answer to.

I can also confirm this sub par performance on the Sil 3124 - max throughput
of around 120MB/s.

If your motherboard is able to set the "PCIe Max Payload Size" you may be
able to improve things.

See Note 3 here:

http://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Hardware,_driver_status#Silicon_Image_3124

Another one here with a Sil3124 and max 120MB/s.

With the port multiplier I've got, I've had to disable NCQ to get
things to behave when accessing multiple drives - otherwise access to
the enclosure would lock up under moderate/heavy concurrent disk
access.

The multipler appears to be a Sil4726.  The array was built on a
budget so the drives in the multiplier are a mix of drives - some are
1.5Mbps, some are 3.0Mbps and not all support NCQ.  Not sure how it
behaves with 100% NCQ capable drives.


My port multiplier is a Sil3726, so very similar. However, my drives are all more or less identical and are all NCQ capable. I've been able to beat on them for days at a time under non-stop load and not had a problem.

--

Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>

GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford

InfiniBand Specific RPMS
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband




Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux