I have not patched yet my code with this new serie, but where is patch 1/6 ? Does it exist or simply wrong numbering ? On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Andre Noll <maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18:51, raz ben yehuda wrote: > >> > and as we aren't using ->sectors in this loop any more, I think it >> > can be discarded completely, just making struct strip_zone 20% smaller >> > and improving cache performance. >> > >> > What do you think? >> hamm.. please do not do it now. I think i need it for the reshape >> because I have to traverse each zone up to its end. > > Well, you can always get the zone size of zone #i by > > z[i].zone_end - z[i - 1].zone_end > > (with z[-1].zone_end := 0). Since reshape is a slow operation anyway, > the additional subtraction won't hurt, and we'd have the smaller > cache footprint during normal operation. So I'd be inclined to kill > ->sectors as well. > > Andre > -- > The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFKDabAWto1QDEAkw8RAoEmAKCqYyRinCYIuXWi4fhJSLKfj//2XgCfYTfp > z0lX/gg5fAfGb8IM0XKOAl4= > =ShCN > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
