On 06:38, NeilBrown wrote: > I was thinking further about this and realised that in the first zone, > zone_start is always 0. And we added a sentinal zone for which only > the zone_start value is set. This seems silly. Yes, it is. > Instead we can just store 'zone_end' in each zone (or possibly > start_of_next_zone) and then we don't need the sentinal and don't waste > the zone_start at the beginning. That's what I did in the new version of the patch set. I'll send it out shortly. Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
