Daniel Reurich wrote: > > We are already in pain at not having the capability to reliably boot > from a software raid array. > We have that just fine. Use a RAID-1, which means that as long as the firmware can find ANY disk you can boot from it, at which time you have the full library of Linux drivers available, and it doesn't matter how bad things work. > This is the last hurdle to supplanting proprietary hardware raid > controllers with their proprietary drivers and management tool stacks, > and make software raid actually use able for the average Joe with his > small business server built from cheap commodity hardware running linux. > > Or is this what your scared of? The cheap commodity hardware running Linux is exactly what I want to make work correctly; in particular I want it to work even when Joe finds that a card goes dead in his box and he buys another one off the shelf. At that point, it should JUST WORK, no matter how broken the firmware is (extremely common) or even if the card comes with no firmware at all (common enough). We already have the technology to splitting the disk between the boot region and the array region (partition tables) and making sure that the boot region is fully replicated (RAID-1). That is what we should be deploying, and if it somehow is too hard to deploy, that is what should be fixed. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
