Re: Reliability of bitmapped resync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday February 24, piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,

I'll wait for these details before I start hunting further.
OK, here we are.
Some forewords, the last disk to fail at boot was
/dev/sda, this data was collected after a "clean"
add of the /dev/sda3 to the RAID.
This means the superblock was zeroed and the device
added, so it should be clean.

....

Thanks a lot for that.

Now, one thing I do not understand, but maybe it is
anyway OK, and it is this last line:

          Bitmap : 945199 bits (chunks), 524289 dirty (55.5%)

Because the array status was fully recovered (in sync)
and /dev/sdb3 showed:

          Bitmap : 945199 bits (chunks), 1 dirty (0.0%)

Confirmed somehow by /proc/mdstat

How it could be 55.5% dirty? Is this expected?

This is a bug.  Is fixed by a patch that I have queued for 2.6.30.  As
it doesn't cause a crash or data corruption, it doesn't get to jump
the queue.  It is very small though:

Belatedly I ask if this went to -stable for 2.6.29.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
 "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux