Re: Reliability of bitmapped resync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, February 24, 2009 8:40 am, Piergiorgio Sartor wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I might have found something.  If the bitmap chunk size is smaller than
>> the raid10 chunk size, and the first bitmap chunk in a raid10 chunk is
>> clean, it might be skipping the remaining bitmap chunks in that
>> raid10 chunk.
>
> the RAID-10 chunk is standard 64K, the bitmap
> chunk should be 256K.
> So, this does not seem to be the case, if I
> got it correctly.

OK.. In that case I cannot reproduce the problem.


>
>> Can you please show me "--examine" and "--examine-bitmap" of one of the
>> devices in your array please.
>
> OK, but you'll have to wait until tomorrow, I do
> not have the PC here (it is an office PC).

I'll wait for these details before I start hunting further.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux