Re: Reliability of bitmapped resync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> I might have found something.  If the bitmap chunk size is smaller than
> the raid10 chunk size, and the first bitmap chunk in a raid10 chunk is
> clean, it might be skipping the remaining bitmap chunks in that
> raid10 chunk.

the RAID-10 chunk is standard 64K, the bitmap
chunk should be 256K.
So, this does not seem to be the case, if I
got it correctly.

> Can you please show me "--examine" and "--examine-bitmap" of one of the
> devices in your array please.

OK, but you'll have to wait until tomorrow, I do
not have the PC here (it is an office PC).

bye,

-- 

piergiorgio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux