Re: zeroing superblocks on running systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



also sprach NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> [2008.11.08.2127 +0100]:
> Do we want '--zero-superblock-die-die-die' which would avoid the
> O_EXCL for you?  We cannot use "--force" as that means "write zeros
> even if it doesn't look like a real superblock".
> .... though I'm not really sure that is useful to keep.

I don't think we want an option with "die-die-die" in the name for
good reasons. There is probably nothing you can do for me, I'll just
have to reboot one day...

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
humpty was pushed.
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux