I'm using near=2, far=1, superblock version=00.90.03 I'm not sure about offset, but its the default. I wan't to clearify one thing about the data, its not only a problem with encryption over raid, you get the same drop without encryption... but you can remedy it by setting up the readahead, which gives no effect when using encryption. On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 01:19:50AM +0200, Daniel Zetterman wrote: >> I've done some more tests and here are the results: >> >> # bonnie++ during resync with readahead set to 512 (encrypted raid10) >> kpax,4G,,,77308,21,34585,17,,,82073,33,384.8,1,,,,,,,,,,,,, > > It would be nice to know which layout (near,far,offset) > that you are using for the test. The expected results are quite > dependent on this. > > best regards > keld > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
